Member-only story
Why Traditional Security Misunderstands Generative AI and You Bear the Cost
Traditional security gatekeepers often argue that using generative AI tools is inherently unsafe. Let me guess — something along the lines of “It’s risky! IP leakage! Data insecurity!” However, these fears often stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of how generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Cursor, and Midjourney actually operate. On top of that, some corporate giants are more than happy to exploit these concerns to push their own products, reinforcing the idea that only “traditional,” static, vendor-controlled tools are safe. It’s time we set the record straight.
Let’s break down the architecture of modern AI tools, dive into their multi-layered structure, and see why their security risks are fundamentally different from those of old-school cloud-hosted corporate solutions — think Oracle, Salesforce, and Office 365.
The rapid evolution of AI systems, particularly generative models, has left many compliance and security professionals struggling to keep up. Traditional approaches to compliance and security often misinterpret generative AI, resulting in misplaced fears and inefficient policies concerning information security, personal data, and intellectual property (IP) protection.
